ck_epoch: add barrier_wait operation.

include/ck_epoch.h

@@ -258,6 +258,12 @@ bool ck_epoch_poll(ck_epoch_record_t *);
 void ck_epoch_synchronize(ck_epoch_record_t *);
 void ck_epoch_synchronize_wait(ck_epoch_t *, ck_epoch_wait_cb_t *, void *);
 void ck_epoch_barrier(ck_epoch_record_t *);
+void ck_epoch_barrier_wait(ck_epoch_record_t *, ck_epoch_wait_cb_t *, void *);
+
+/*
+ * Reclaim entries associated with a record. This is safe to call only on
+ * the caller's record or records that are using call_strict.
+ */
 void ck_epoch_reclaim(ck_epoch_record_t *);
 
 #endif /* CK_EPOCH_H */

src/ck_epoch.c

@@ -531,6 +531,16 @@ ck_epoch_barrier(struct ck_epoch_record *record)
 	return;
 }
 
+void
+ck_epoch_barrier_wait(struct ck_epoch_record *record, ck_epoch_wait_cb_t *cb,
+    void *ct)
+{
+
+	ck_epoch_synchronize_wait(record->global, cb, ct);
+	ck_epoch_reclaim(record);
+	return;
+}
+
 /*
  * It may be worth it to actually apply these deferral semantics to an epoch
  * that was observed at ck_epoch_call time. The problem is that the latter