docs: added comments to SIGALRM

main
Sean McBride 4 years ago
parent 233ba1fa13
commit e0df43fedf

@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ software_interrupt_handle_signals(int signal_type, siginfo_t *signal_info, void
if (signal_info->si_code == SI_KERNEL) {
/* Signal was sent directly by the kernel, so forward to other threads */
for (int i = 0; i < runtime_total_worker_processors; i++) {
if (pthread_self() != runtime_worker_threads[i]) {
pthread_kill(runtime_worker_threads[i], SIGALRM);
}
if (pthread_self() == runtime_worker_threads[i]) continue;
pthread_kill(runtime_worker_threads[i], SIGALRM);
}
} else {
/* Signal forwarded from another thread. Just confirm it resulted from pthread_kill */
@ -90,8 +90,24 @@ software_interrupt_handle_signals(int signal_type, siginfo_t *signal_info, void
/* Do not allow more than one layer of preemption */
if (worker_thread_next_context) return;
/* if the current sandbox is NULL or in a RETURNED state, nothing to preempt, so just return */
/*
* if a SIGALRM fires while the worker thread is between sandboxes, executing libuv, completion queue
* cleanup, etc. current_sandbox might be NULL. In this case, we should just allow return to allow the
* worker thread to run the main loop until it loads a new sandbox.
*
* TODO: Consider if this should be an invarient and the worker thread should disable software
* interrupts when doing this work.
*/
if (!current_sandbox) return;
/*
* if a SIGALRM fires while the worker thread executing cleanup of a sandbox, it might be in a RETURNED
* state. In this case, we should just allow return to allow the sandbox to complete cleanup, as it is
* about to switch to a new sandbox.
*
* TODO: Consider if this should be an invarient and the worker thread should disable software
* interrupts when doing this work.
*/
if (current_sandbox->state == SANDBOX_RETURNED) return;
/* Preempt */

Loading…
Cancel
Save